Statist of the Week: Congressman Mike Simpson

I have been re-reading my U.S. Constitution. Did you know there’s a part where it says “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”? Of course you did! But this week’s Statist of the Week apparently does not know this. Or he does not think it’s important enough of a principle to defend. He’s Congressman Mike Simpson, and he just voted to infringe on our Second Amendment rights.  

Simpson voted in favor of a bill that would allow the government to confiscate guns from members of our armed forces. The gun-seizing provisions are in the annual National Defense Authorization Act that provides money for the U.S. military. 

This gun-grab without due process is known as a “red flag” law, which gives the government the ability to take away someone’s weapons or prevent them from  possessing a firearm. A member of the American military could be denied their Second Amendment rights, and they wouldn’t be able to do anything about it for a minimum of 30 days.

I asked Congressman Simpson’s office for an explanation for this vote, and his office sent out a statement in which Simpson is quoted as saying he opposes the anti-gun rights provision that he voted for. He said it was added by House Democrats during the initial drafting process. Simpson went on to say that he expects the provision to be removed from the NDAA before it becomes law but that the bill needed to advance to the Senate so that a conference committee could work out the differences between the two chambers. 

But that explanation just does not sit well for me. Just go back to the Constitution, which Simpson took an oath to uphold. Simpson swore, without condition, he’d support the Constitution. There’s no asterisk in that oath that says it’s OK to let a constitutionally-protected right or two slide here and there, with the promise that the U.S. Senate will clean things up later. 

Simspon could have voted no, and if enough members did the same, the bill might have failed. Rejecting the NDAA would not mean that our military would not be funded. It just means that Congress would have had to go work on another bill. And maybe that second attempt would advance without the gun-snagging provision included. 

If a majority of the Congress opposed the provision to take guns away from service members without due process, it’s quite possible the matter would stop being pushed each year. 

This is not Mike Simpson’s first time as a Statist of the Week. In fact, he’s in the running for Statist of the Year because he proposed breaching the Snake River dams that are vital to Idaho’s economy, agriculture, tourism, and electricity generation He famously said he doesn’t even know if breaching the dams will accomplish his stated goal of saving the salmon.

On guns and salmon, Simpson is out of touch with Idahoans, but he’s very much in touch with his inner statist, which is why he’s this week’s Statist of the Week. 

Who should be next week’s winner? Drop me a note at or leave a comment down below the video. Don’t forget to subscribe to our video upload channels, hit the like button and share this with your friends and frenemies. We’ll talk to you again soon.

Statist of the Week: Marlene Tromp

I was just getting ready to declare this week’s winner of the coveted Statist of the Week award. It was just about to be the entire Boise City Council, which just voted to spend $15,000 warning pet owners about the dangers of hot asphalt. 

I mean, that’s really important, I guess, what with it being almost October and temperatures getting down into the 40s and all. And plus, what did people do about their pets before city government came along to warn them that hot pavement might hurt your dog’s paws? Maybe next, the city will put signs up at Starbucks warning that your coffee is hot. Or maybe signs at the ice cream store warning that you’ll get brain freeze if you eat too fast. 

Warn your neighbors, there’s bad stuff out there, and you can never be too careful. Boise city government is here to save the day.

But just as I was about to start writing, along comes Boise State University President Marlene Tromp to steal the show. Tromp announced Friday afternoon that students attending the Boise State Broncos football game would need to show proof of a COVID-19 vaccination or a negative test. 

Putting aside the fact that BSU waited until the day before the game to announce its decision — that’s just bad leadership — Tromp is now the first state employee to impose a COVID vaccine mandate on people in Idaho. 

And why wouldn’t she? Tromp has been acting like a tyrant since she got here. She does whatever the heck she wants. If the Legislature tells BSU to get back to its core mission or it cuts $1.5 million from BSU’s social justice programs, Tromp has proven she’ll just ignore the state’s elected senators and representatives. 

Cut our funding? We’ll make sure the gender equity center and the school’s various racist programs stay no matter what lawmakers say.

This time, Tromp is ignoring the intent of Gov. Brad Little’s executive order banning state agencies from requiring vaccine passports. Yes, it’s a problem that Little has decided to let Tromp get away with it, but that does not change the fact that she is openly a statist who believes in the use of government force, and this time she’s applying that force to ticket holders for Boise State football games. 

Sure she uses BSU as an extension of her own social justice views, but now she’s happy to test out some authoritarianism, too, in a move that is clearly about government control. So while the do-gooders at Boise City Hall are definitely statists for believing government has to solve every problem, Marlene Tromp is a statist who uses force when given the opportunity. And that’s why BSU President Marlene Tromp is our statist of the week. 

Who should be next week’s winner? Drop me a note,, leave a comment, like, and share this view and we’ll talk to you again soon. 

Statist of the Week: Luke Malek

This week’s Statist of the Week wants you to believe he’s a true conservative. Malek, who is running to serve as Idaho’s next lieutenant governor, recently sent out a fundraising letter in which he says, “True conservatives stand for smaller government. True conservatives don’t tell employers how to run their businesses.” 

We agree. What Malek is saying is 100% true. True conservatives stand for smaller government and they stay out of the business of running someone else’s business. And that’s why Malek is not a true conservative. Just look at his voting record from when he was in the state House of Representatives. 

Malek voted to increase government regulation over the bail bondsmen, credit reporting agencies, electricians, HVAC technicians, sign language interpreters, dietitians, insurance companies, marriage counselors, genetic counselors, optometrists, massage therapy schools, oil and gas industry, real estate agents, auto dealers, and naturopaths. And that’s just spending a few minutes looking at his record of his last few years in office. 

Malek also voted to create or expand numerous government agencies and programs, including his vote in 2013, his first year in office, to create an Obamacare insurance exchange, and later in his career, to create a new taxpayer-funded scholarship program for college dropouts. 

In 2015, Malek scored a 37 percent on the Freedom Index. In 2016, his Freedom score was 59 percent. In 2017, he clocked in at 42 percent. And in 2018, his final year in the Legislature, he came in with a Freedom score at 66.4 percent.

In his tenure in the Legislature, no one could mistake Malek for a conservative. But now, he wants to convince people that he’s the guy who would vote against telling businesses what to do and how to do it. And that’s why he’s this week’s Statist of the Week. Who should be next week’s winner? Let me know by emailing

And this is your last chance to vote for our Statist of the Quarter for Q2 of 2021. You can vote by clicking here.  

Petition: Urge Bedke, Little to call Legislature back to session

Throughout the country, people are being coerced to surrender control over their bodies and medical privacy. Supposedly free Americans being told that their right to work, travel, shop, and congregate will be severely abridged if they don’t inject a foreign substance into their bodies. Our society is quickly being divided into vaccinated and unvaccinated, with the latter facing discrimination if they don’t comply. 

Both House Speaker Scott Bedke and Gov. Brad Little have the power to call the Legislature back to session to stop the madness.

This is about basic human rights, protected by our country’s founding documents. It is the proper role of government to act in the interest of protecting those rights. 

Compelling someone to inject something into their bodies is a form of assault. Ordering people to disclose their medical status is an invasion of privacy. These are tangible issues for lawmakers to deliberate, and time is running short to do so.

With the House in recess since May, Bedke has the power to bring the Legislature back. Gov. Little has always had the constitutional authority to call the Legislature back as well. It’s time for Bedke and Little to demonstrate leadership on issues of growing concern for Idahoans. Tell them to not delay any longer. It’s time for the Legislature to get to work. 

Petition: Urge Bedke, Little to call Legislature back to session

Gov. Little and Speaker Bedke,

%your signature%

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more

Share this with your friends: